Mentally Impaired, Psychopathic Neo-Fascists Occupy White House

Stench of raw sewage envelopes Mall.

After the smell clears, we need to raise an army in all haste. In doing that, we are hamstrung by a clear lack of coherence and cohesion. We have been in confusion telling everyone, and our 100 recruits, that we have 100 different opponents. Of our potential recruits, 10 went left, 20 went up, 13 colonized in place, and 57 said “I dunno exactly where to shoot.” In working through the confusion, we discuss what the journey to a name involved in the following sections:

A. Mixed messages fragment us

B. What are they, again?

C. Why have we not even decided on the foe’s name?

D. What is a name?

E. We named our foe

A. Mixed messages fragment us

The horrific part is that we are doing the fragmenting to ourselves. Our foe loves our fragmentation. They just love it. They love to see us in such utter disarray. That is where we are, and they laugh at us. They laugh at you Simon Rosenberg. They laugh at you James Carville. They laugh at you Rachel Maddow. They especially love it when you use “MAGA”, their promotional advertising slogan. Even I have to laugh at all of us.

Except this is NOT FUNNY! You can see in this picture why we need to raise, organize, train, and arm an army. Because we face an opposing army that has resources we will never have. They are wealthy. They market better.

Their weakness is that they are an unorganized confederacy of the disaffected, the undereducated, and those so ignorant that buy the BS that Trump never took the president’s salary. We can fragment them and pick off groups by organizing, getting our act TOGETHER, and speaking and writing clearly and in unison

B. What are they, again?

Anybody know the name of the Democrats’ foe? What is the name of our foe? Is it MAGA? Oligarchs? Trumpets? Trumplers? I had not a clue, like you, but I am not having that void. Not having it.

Labeling is easy. MAGA is a meaningless label founded in utter bullshit. That is so true, the whole world bought into it, even us Democrats. You never came up with an alternative name for them. Why the heck not? I will tell you why. You came up with 100 alternative names. What have you been doing for the last 9 years, with no agreed name—for 9 years. Miami’s “No Name Defense” was really good, but frankly you suck.

DNC promotional advertising is bankrupt, and you let this situation exist because you will not unite under a single flag. Hear women roar in that last election? Sounded something like “gross, eerie lices”. It made no sense at all, even if you did understand them while standing in line at the store where I actually heard the cashier say, “You can say what you want, but he never even took a salary.” Pa-uke!

A single voice carries a clear message, but millions of voices saying different words are not intelligible.

What if we all used the same words? Just throwing that out there. Clearly millions of voices would be heard if they were saying the same words. They would be understood. Make no mistake.

Covey Rule Number Four: Put First Things First. Ever hear, “It looks like it as written by 100 authors?” I have a ton of experience overcoming this incoherent pitfall. I eradicated it. My proposal teams always began writing with a single voice.

We avoided the incoherence problem by stitching the messages together into a single voice before we did anything else. For my battles, before we began writing, my proposal teams first worked out the mind maps for the technical approach, the management approach, the discriminators, and the themes, in that order. The mind maps were the catch phrases, the key message words, to be used in that section. Yes, we followed Covey Rule Number Four: Put First Things First. (Don’t ask me why is that rule Four instead of Number One. Ask Covey.) It is an important rule no matter where it is.

Our pens are deadly swords to write and draw both truth and ridicule. We must do both. Truth cuts and ridicule embarrasses. Our voices and written words must bash and ridicule a single-named foe over and over. We bash the psychopathic neo-fascists the way Don, Jr. bashes Kimberly. Ambassadorship?

Before we began our seance to work out our messaging, everyone on our proposal effort had agreed that what was to follow were the specific words that we would all use in our sections!

These people invested heavily in this concept. They spent 3 full days locked in a room working out the words on these mind maps. Exhausted at the end of the 3-day session, each writer believed that they had personally conjured up the words. Because they had. They had—and they were proud of their effort. There was buy-in.

Systems Engineering 101. That front-end, pre-battle effort says how important the messages are to me. You will find no other proposal group doing 3-days of this type of systems engineering to front-end a proposal effort’s messaging. (The front-end process is essentially the Systems Engineer’s front-end requirements cataloging effort.) TRW’s SVP wrote in a white paper (on lessons regarding Toyota) about the efficacy of our proposal processes’ front-end requirements definition.

Pre-defining the requirements is a critical systems engineering feature of my successful approach to battle. Using the agreed messages in their mind maps, my teams joined in unison. Hence in doing their graphics and their writing. they presented clear, agreed messages across the spectrum, with each participant using the exact same words. The teams had committed to doing it verbatim, and were willing to do so because they had developed the mind MAPS. Maps were critical to stitch the messages together in an ordered hierarchy.

C. Why have we not even decided on the foe’s name?

We know the DNC has left the issue up to the pundits. The DNC is not led by writers, they are public speakers. The pundits carry the burden, but they are in competition for your eyeballs and ears. They are knowledgeable critics, and they earned your watchful eye with their expertise. I do not want to castigate these pundits, but they want to sell their words only. They eschew using another pundit’s words and catch phrases for competitive reasons. I am guessing that stint they got on MSNBC has $ associated.

Being a pundit/critic is facing backwards to something past. You build an army and its message for something in the future.

The last political critic to build something for the future was my friend Benjamin Franklin. He was such a wordsmith, and printer. On May 9 in 1754, Benjamin Franklin published in The Pennsylvania Gazette one of the most famous woodcuts in history: the “Join, or Die.” woodcut.

When this came out, I stood in awe there reading it. I have carried this woodcut as a cloth flag with me through battles so numerous I cannot recount them all. Buy-in is critical to stitch together an army from fragments. Mind mapping efforts created buy-in in my battlefield.

Franklin's art carried significant importance at the time. It visually and clearly stated the problem. This woodcut is considered our earliest masterpiece of political messaging.

This woodcut’s meaning is clear to me in today’s context. We need to join in naming this foe clearly and succinctly and with the malice deserved. Not cute. Not catchy. Direct, malicious, and inflammatory. Why?

We have to raise, rouse, and rile our army against a vile, dangerous, existential threat to this nation.

When you are done appropriately naming your foe, the only questions will be: 1) whether you are faithful to the arché, and 2) whether you are accurate (within the historical world as we know it). The name cannot fail in either.

Faithful implies you follow a clear arché from a source and set the correct direction. Accuracy implies your foe’s name is including everybody in the grouping named. I am disappointed with the many labels. Fukity Worms is a label. Trumplerds is a label. Does not sell to anyone other than its author.

D. What is a name?

Isabella Rossellini is a name, and perhaps the most beautiful name ever. Two four-syllable words. The syllables set a cadence with the voice. That cadence just rolls off the tongue. I say those words over and over. Isabella Rossellini. Isabella Rossellini. Then with an Italian accent. Isabella Rossellini. Isabella Rossellini. (I just love her. She is second, behind Audrey Hepburn.)

Cadences Extrapolated. Try these next two, four-syllable words. (I then say them over and over.) Psychopathic neo-fascist. Psychopathic neo-fascist. Psychopathic neo-fascist.

Psychopathic neo-fascist (PNF) is a faithful and an accurate name that we came up with in my Hot Buttons community. It was a group effort.

That name, psychopathic neo-fascist, is the product of our exploration on this subject with this community. We worked with a unison that the DNC has not even seen the need to do.

To me, our previous messaging disorganization has been a horrendous failure. Cohesive and coherent messaging has extreme import to one that has carried the “Join, or Die.” flag for so long! I cringe every time I hear a misnomer. Cringing so much has caused a permanent sloping of my shoulders.

Heather, Joyce, Lorissa, Jennifer, Gloria, Scott, Jeff, Steve, Aaron etc. have to pick me back up daily. If the Substack pens will join in unison, we will get the message across. Share my post, please.

We had a bump in our road and are broken. But tomorrow we will be stronger. Much stronger. Twice as many writers will be here, fully armed.

Protest drawing by Lucille Clerc.

I am trying to standardize not just our lexicon, but also our message. We face a nasty foe that will establish a dictatorship. Psychopathic neo-fascists have lied and conned their way into power with hundreds of $ millions of dark money that was not legal 15 years ago. Their end goal is totalitarianism.

Mass Psychosis. They work hard to create mass psychosis. The threat is very real. Mass psychosis grips half this country. The entire psychotic group is isolated into one propaganda channel, Fox. This link below is a YouTube presentation by After Skool about “Mass Psychosis: How an Entire Population Becomes Mentally Ill”. This is the source of the colorful art herein. It is an excellent piece on mass psychosis and totalitarianism, at this link.

I never have watched Fox, and elect to retain my mind for the purpose of bringing corrective truth to those that will listen.

I know that giving our foe a single name and our using a single voice are the two foundational blocks critical to building a protective wall around our army and our wards.

E. We named our foe

The name of our foe must be as pejorative as it is vile. The name’s arché, directional accuracy, truth, and creativity are critical to shaming our foe and getting them to look deeper into themselves. I do not have to defend my integrity. Every psychopathic neo-fascist does have to explain away their psychosis. They have to defend their integrity. They have to make excuses for their lack of morality. Every time you call them a psychopathic neo-fascist, that is. We have to push them back onto their heels. Make them put up or shut up.

Most of these people are exploited “suffering souls” (psychopaths) turned willingly neo-fascist. Going willingly is their collective way to cede control of their lives, freedoms, wealth, education, and health to their rulers. These are not leaders, but rather they are followers. These followers do not know these rulers have no empathy or goodwill either toward them, or for them. They are disposable.

I have seen the totalitarian system at its worst. The fear mongering has a purpose that worked to subjugate our populace. I do not know if we can regain control. Square one is to name them pejoratively and accurately, but fairly. I did not say nicely.

Four of my most recent (previous) posts walk you through the work my community has done to date to define them with a name that can stick. Psychopathic neo-fascist (PNF) is that name.

Stronger voices than mine are needed to carry the anti-psychopathic neo-fascist (APNF) flag to the populace that will buy-in. I am a writer, not a speaker, thought I teach my craft and facilitate mind mapping group gropes. That takes some talking. Blessings to those that will broadcast this message.